Namaeh Farhangistan

Namaeh Farhangistan

Word Formation in Persian from the Perspective of an Onomasiological Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Abstract
Pavol Štekauer's word formation model adopts a new combined approach that involves both the functional-structural framework of the Prague school of linguistics and a cognitive approach to word formation. Called the ‘naming theory’, it moves from the concept to the word form. According to this theory, the initial point of departure in forming a word (or, a naming unit) in a language involves the analysis of a concept related to an extralinguistic entity for which a member or members of the linguistic community feel the need to coin a name. This view of word formation assigns only a morphological status to the word form/naming unit but no role whatsoever to syntax. However, it is shown in this manuscript that certain words in Persian are formed syntactically.
Keywords

 
Mason, Julia (2011), Meaning Predictability and Recursion in Onomasiology, Masters Thesis, Edinburgh University.
Štekauer, Pavol (1998), An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
ــــــــــ (2001) ‘Fundamental Principles of an Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation’, in Grzega, Joachim (ed.) A Recollection of 11 Years of Onomasiology Online (2000–2010).
ــــــــــ (2005a.), Meaning Predictability in Word-Formation, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
ــــــــــ (2005b.), Onomasiological Approach to Word-Formation, in Štekauer, P. and Lieber, Rochelle (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 207–232.
ــــــــــ (2016), Compounding from an Onomasiological Perspective, in ten Hacken, Pius, The Semantics of Compounding. Cambridge University Press, pp. 54-68.