Namaeh Farhangistan

Namaeh Farhangistan

A Typology of Word Stress Based on Language Acquisition and Processing

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Word stress can be examined through the lens of language processing and acquisition algorithms—algorithms that analyze language as a continuous sequence of auditory signals rather than a set of predefined words and labels. This perspective, which considers infants' cognitive characteristics and limitations, reveals new layers of complexity in the way linguistic phenomena are encountered and processed. In this paper, we investigate word stress based on patterns of infant language acquisition from continuous speech, addressing challenges that traditional approaches often overlook, where stress is described with clear-cut lexical boundaries and morphosyntactic labels. We review a cognitive model of stress acquisition developed by Peperkamp and Dupoux, emphasizing its core assumptions and typological predictions. We then explore cross-linguistic differences in stress pattern observability and the accessibility of stress-learning algorithms in languages with phonologically predictable stress patterns, examining distinctions between phonological and morphological predictability. Next, we turn to Persian, focusing on the unique challenges it presents for stress acquisition algorithms and the key questions it raises. Finally, we propose directions for future research on Persian stress, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration, large-scale collection of naturalistic data, and the application of self-supervised machine learning models.
Keywords

Subjects


معصومی، انیس و گلناز مدرسی قوامی (1401)، «ناشنوایی تکیه در گونه‌های تهرانی و کرمانی زبان فارسی»، زبان پژوهی، دورۀ 14، ش 44 (پیاپی 44)، ص 255-283.
Christophe, A. et al. (1994), “Do Infants Perceive Word Boundaries? An Empirical Study of the Bootstrapping of Lexical Acquisition”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(3), p. 1570-1580.
Dresher, B. E. and J. D. Kaye (1990), “A Computational Learning Model for Metrical Phonology”, Cognition, 34(2), p. 137-195.
Dupoux, E. (2018), “Cognitive Science in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (A Roadmap for Reverse-engineering the Infant Language-learner)”, Cognition, 173, p. 43-59.
Dupoux, E., et al. (1997), “A Destressing “Deafness” in French?”, Journal of Memory and Language, 36(3), p. 406-421.
Dupoux, E. et al. (2001), “A Robust Method to Study Stress Deafness”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), p. 1606-1618.
Dupoux, E. and S. Peperkamp (2002), “Fossil Markers of Language Development (Phonological Deafnesses in Adult Speech Processing)”, Phonetics, Phonology, and Cognition, Oxford, Oxford University, p. 168-190.
Dupoux, E. et al. (2008), “Persistent Stress ‘Deafness’ (The Case of French Learners of Spanish)”, Cognition, 106(2), p. 682-706.
Friederici, A. D. and J. M. Wessels (1993), “Phonotactic Knowledge of Word Boundaries and Its Use in Infant Speech Perception”, Perception and Psychophysics, 54(3), p. 287-295.
Gerken, L., P. W. Jusczyk, and D. R. Mandel (1994), “When Prosody Fails to Cue Syntactic Structure (9-Month-Olds' Sensitivity to Phonological Versus Syntactic Phrases)”, Cognition, 51(3), p. 237-265.
Hirsh-Pasek, K. et al. (1987), “Clauses Are Perceptual Units for Young Infants”, Cognition, 26(3), p. 269-286.
Jusczyk, P. W. et al. (1993), “Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words”, Journal of Memory and Language, 32(3), p. 402-420.
Jusczyk, P. W., P. A. Luce and J. Charlss-Luce (1994), “Infants' Sensitivity to Phonotatic Patterns in the Native Language”, Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), p. 630-645.
Jusczyk, P. W. and R. N. Aslin (1995), “Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech”, Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), p. 1-23.
Mehler, J., E. Dupoux, and J. Segui (1990), “Constraining Models of Lexical Access (The Onset of Word Recognition)”, Cognitive Models of Speech Processing (Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives), Gary Altmann (ed.), Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 236-262.
Myers, J. et al. (1996), “Infants' Sensitivity to Word Boundaries in Fluent Speech”, Journal of Child Language, 23(1), p. 1-30.
Peperkamp, S. and E. Dupoux (2002), “A Typological Study of Stress Deafness”, Laboratory Phonology, 7(2000), p. 203-240.
Peperkamp, S. A., (2004), “Lexical Execptions in Stress System (Arguments from Early Language Acquistion and Adult Speech Perception)”, Language, 80(1), p. 98-126.
Rahmani, H. (2019), An Evidence-Based New Analysis of Persian Word Prosody, Amsterdam, LOT.
Rahmani, H., T. Rietveld and C. Gussenhoven (2015), “Stress Deafness Reveals Absence of Lexical Marking of Stress or Tone in the Adult Grammar”, PloS One 10(12), https://doi.org10.1371/journal.pone.0143968.
_________ (2018), “Post-Focal and Factive Deaccentuation in Persian”, Glossa (A Journal of General Linguistics), 3(1), Artivle 13. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.328.
Räsänen, O., G. Doyle and M. C. Frank (2018), “Pre-Linguistic Segmentation of Speech Into Syllable-Like Units”. Cognition, 171, p. 130-150.
Shady, M. E. (1996), Dissertation, “Infants' Sensitivity to Function Morphemes”, Buffalo, State University of New York.
Shi, R., J. L. Morgan, and P., Allopenna (1998), “Phonological and Acoustic Bases for Earliest Grammatical Category Assignment (A Cross-Linguistic Perspective)”, Journal of Child Language, 25(1), p. 169-201.
Shi, R. (2014), “Functional Morphemes and Early Language Acquisition”, Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), p. 6-11.
Swingley, D. and R. Algayres (2024), “Computational Modeling of the Segmentation of Sentence Stimuli From an Infant Word‐Finding Study”, Cognitive Science, 48(3), e13427, https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13427.
Tesar, B. and P. Smolensky (1998), “Learnability in Optimality Theory”, Linguistic Inquiry, 29(2), p. 229-268.
Volume 24, Issue 2 - Serial Number 96
Nameh Farhangestan (Iranian languages ​​and dialects)
May and June 2025
Pages 99-122

  • Receive Date 15 November 2024
  • Revise Date 28 November 2024
  • Accept Date 20 January 2025